Theory 3: What actually hit the Pentagon ?
The government and the media have told us that a Boeing 757 airliner hit the Pentagon (United States of America Military Base) at nearly 9:38 am. on Sept. 11, 2001. But there is sustainable proof to prove that this plane did not fly into the pentagon that morning.
According to Boeing’s own web site, the 757 is 155 feet, 3 inches long. It has a wing span of 124 feet, 10 inches. And it is 44 feet, six inches high at the tail. It has a capacity of 11,276 American gallons of jet fuel. Yet it is believed that the 757 crashed into the side of the pentagon an and created a hole of 73ft in height, and 65ft in width in the Pentagon. It is not possibly for a plane that size to make a hole in the building that is smaller than the size of the plane originally its scientifically not possible.
According to Boeing’s own web site, the 757 is 155 feet, 3 inches long. It has a wing span of 124 feet, 10 inches. And it is 44 feet, six inches high at the tail. It has a capacity of 11,276 American gallons of jet fuel. Yet it is believed that the 757 crashed into the side of the pentagon an and created a hole of 73ft in height, and 65ft in width in the Pentagon. It is not possibly for a plane that size to make a hole in the building that is smaller than the size of the plane originally its scientifically not possible.
In comparison to the World Trade centre towers how they burst into flames as result of the jet fuel from the planes, so why did the Pentagon not do the same thing? This does not add up. How can such a large plane carrying a large amount of fuel collide with a building and leave it with very little fire damage, this makes the story very controversial compared to the WTC towers the stories just don't add up. There are many clear photographs that show intact furniture such as desk, chairs, tables, open books and bookshelves all near or at the open edge from where the plane entered the building. But yet none of these object showed any signs of fire damage they look normal which is hardly believable considering a plane was meant to have collided within metres of these objects.
There is little to no wreckage left from the 757 that is connected with the plane directly. The engines, that are incredibly strong and durable were not recovered. There were no bodies, no seats, no pieces of luggage nothing to give conformation that this was in fact a plane. There are people who can justify this they believe that the plane and all its belongings disintegrated from the initial explosion. The problem with this theory s that it does not add up because if there was enough heat to disintegrate the plane how are their possibly office furniture un touched and showing no sign of fire damage on the edge of the sheared off wall exactly where the plane would have entered ? The heat was intense enough to vaporize the plane but not hot enough to set office furniture or books on fire.
An employee at the Pentagon whose "desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane apparently hit the outside wall" stated in a sworn complaint (before the U.S District Court Southern District of New York): "As she sat down to work there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. She was able to make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no plane wreckage or any burning fuel, only rubble and dust."
How is it possible that The pentagon one of the most secure buildings in the world was hit by something but supposedly there is not one clear image of this happening? According to the Washington Times, the heli-pad located close to the impact sight of the collision has 24/7 surveillance. They also reported that the FBI has admitted to have 83 different videos of the crash. So the FBI have all of this information about the crash and all that has been released to the public are 5 frames that can not be used to prove anything. What are the FBI hiding?
To make the FBI look even more suspicious it was also reported that the FBI confiscated footage from cameras near by the Pentagon at the Sheraton hotel.
Also the FBI turned up minutes after the collision to the gas station across the street and confiscated their surveillance camera footage. The gas station attendant told the news paper that the video footage would have shown the impact. What is so important that it needs to be hidden from the public ?
More importantly if the 757 didn't hit the Pentagon; what did ?
What hit the pentagon is believed to be a much smaller plane or some form of missile. Because with all of this evidence there is no way that it is physically possible for a Boeing 757 to have collided with the Pentagon but left no wreckage and fired damage.
An employee at the Pentagon whose "desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane apparently hit the outside wall" stated in a sworn complaint (before the U.S District Court Southern District of New York): "As she sat down to work there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. She was able to make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no plane wreckage or any burning fuel, only rubble and dust."
How is it possible that The pentagon one of the most secure buildings in the world was hit by something but supposedly there is not one clear image of this happening? According to the Washington Times, the heli-pad located close to the impact sight of the collision has 24/7 surveillance. They also reported that the FBI has admitted to have 83 different videos of the crash. So the FBI have all of this information about the crash and all that has been released to the public are 5 frames that can not be used to prove anything. What are the FBI hiding?
To make the FBI look even more suspicious it was also reported that the FBI confiscated footage from cameras near by the Pentagon at the Sheraton hotel.
Also the FBI turned up minutes after the collision to the gas station across the street and confiscated their surveillance camera footage. The gas station attendant told the news paper that the video footage would have shown the impact. What is so important that it needs to be hidden from the public ?
More importantly if the 757 didn't hit the Pentagon; what did ?
What hit the pentagon is believed to be a much smaller plane or some form of missile. Because with all of this evidence there is no way that it is physically possible for a Boeing 757 to have collided with the Pentagon but left no wreckage and fired damage.
Above is a video supporting the idea that it was not 757 aircraft that collided into the Pentagon